<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>NewPush &#187; CentOS 5</title> <atom:link href="http://newpush.com/tag/centos-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://newpush.com</link> <description>Server Hosting, Data Warehouse Hosting, Collaboration</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>libstdc++.so.5 is needed by xxx</title><link>http://newpush.com/2009/01/libstdcso5-is-needed-by-xxx/</link> <comments>http://newpush.com/2009/01/libstdcso5-is-needed-by-xxx/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Balazs</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CentOS 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[red hat 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RHEL 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[yum]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wdream.com/archives/30</guid> <description><![CDATA[Trying to install the IBM JDK 64bit I came across the following error: libstdc++.so.5 is needed by ibm-java2-x86_64-sdk-5.0-8a.0.x86_64 It turns out that yum has a neat feature to show what package provides a given component: yum whatprovides libstdc++.so.5 gave the &#8230; <a href="http://newpush.com/2009/01/libstdcso5-is-needed-by-xxx/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to install the IBM JDK 64bit I came across the following error:<pre>libstdc++.so.5 is needed by ibm-java2-x86_64-sdk-5.0-8a.0.x86_64</pre><p>It turns out that yum has a neat feature to show what package provides a given component:<pre>yum whatprovides libstdc++.so.5</pre><p>gave the answer, and<pre>yum install compat-libstdc++-33.i386</pre><p>took care of installingthe missing package.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://newpush.com/2009/01/libstdcso5-is-needed-by-xxx/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Public key for xxx.rpm is not installed</title><link>http://newpush.com/2009/01/public-key-for-xxxrpm-is-not-installed/</link> <comments>http://newpush.com/2009/01/public-key-for-xxxrpm-is-not-installed/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:56:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Balazs</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CentOS 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[red hat]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RHEL 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rpm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[yum]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wdream.com/archives/29</guid> <description><![CDATA[After an upgrade to CentOS 5 / RHEL 5 we got the following error: Downloading Packages: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897 Public key for openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4.x86_64.rpm is not installed It turns out that the key needs &#8230; <a href="http://newpush.com/2009/01/public-key-for-xxxrpm-is-not-installed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After an upgrade to CentOS 5 / RHEL 5 we got the following error:</p><pre>Downloading Packages:
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897
Public key for openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4.x86_64.rpm is not installed
</pre><p>It turns out that the key needs to be loaded and yum has not tried to load the key properly.  The following manual key loading solved the issue:</p><pre>rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5
</pre>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://newpush.com/2009/01/public-key-for-xxxrpm-is-not-installed/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Error: kernel conflicts with e2fsprogs &lt; 1.37-4</title><link>http://newpush.com/2009/01/error-kernel-conflicts-with-e2fsprogs-137-4/</link> <comments>http://newpush.com/2009/01/error-kernel-conflicts-with-e2fsprogs-137-4/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:47:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Balazs</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[CentOS 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[redhat 5]]></category> <category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category> <category><![CDATA[x86_64]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wdream.com/archives/28</guid> <description><![CDATA[During an audit, we noticed that one of our Red Hat 5 / CentOS 5 servers wasn&#8217;t getting the security patches.&#160; Upon running the yum update command manually, we discovered that it fails with: Error: kernel conflicts with e2fsprogs &#60; &#8230; <a href="http://newpush.com/2009/01/error-kernel-conflicts-with-e2fsprogs-137-4/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During an audit, we noticed that one of our Red Hat 5 / CentOS 5 servers wasn&#8217;t getting the security patches.&nbsp; Upon running the yum update command manually, we discovered that it fails with:<pre>Error: kernel conflicts with e2fsprogs &lt; 1.37-4</pre><p>The problem turned out to be the presence of a number if 32bit packages.  To solve it, we removed the 32bit architecture packages with:</p><pre>yum remove *.{i386,i586,i686}</pre><p>(only do that if you are on x86_64 and you verified that the packages you need are present in 64bit version)</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://newpush.com/2009/01/error-kernel-conflicts-with-e2fsprogs-137-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: newpush.com @ 2012-02-09 09:54:27 by W3 Total Cache -->
